Contributors

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Was This Senate Candidate A Regular Commenter On The Smallest Minority?



Inflict his Vill? (oops, I mean opinion:))

So, basically, what you are telling us, Dick, is that if you don't win the argument, you are going to be juvenile and take your ball and go home. Hmmm...

Clearly, we have some serious political porn here for the chest-thumpers to holler "YEAH" at the top of their lungs. "Take that, you Kenyan socialist commie pinkos!"

And the denizens of Kevin Baker's site, upon seeing this candidate, began to use their left hand to gently cup their balls whilst wanking with their right...

20 comments:

juris imprudent said...

Oh how bravely you talk about TSM when you are safely away from there.

Mark Ward said...

Voted off the island, remember? Any time they want me back, all they have to do is vote yes for a return.

And, honestly, there's nothing to be afraid of from people so disconnected from reality. It's becoming worse and worse every day as the world changes and the flaws in their ideology are glowing brighter with each passing moment.

juris imprudent said...

You weren't voted out - you left because you couldn't take the heat. Certainly Kevin never banned you as he did a couple of other people.

Mark Ward said...

You weren't voted out - you left because you couldn't take the heat.

The vote was 2-1. Go back and read the thread. I promised I would abide by the majority's decision. It was a post about the Constitution being eroded.

And, really, I can take anything anyone on there throws at me, especially given the fact that most of it is completely wrong.

Of course, there is the issue (and a sad one at that) of the slide into dementia that is going on over there both by the host and the commenters. I admit to having some reticence at picking on people who have a disability. I don't make it a habit of making fun of people who are so clearly deranged on a number of levels.

Sheik Yarbouti said...

Says Mark as he partially withdraws his head just far enough out of his anal sphincter that he can gently lave his shriveled balls with his tongue as he imagines how awesome it would be if he could only get his tiny penis erect enough to wank with his specially padded tweezers. Perhaps imagining those testicles are Barack (or even Michelle!) Obama's will do the trick, he fervently hopes...

"Someday those totalitarianistic libertarians at TSM will see the error of their ways and they'll beg me to come back, but I won't because they they don't deserve me. That'll show 'em!"

Haplo9 said...

>I admit to having some reticence at picking on people who have a disability. I don't make it a habit of making fun of people who are so clearly deranged on a number of levels.

Omg that's hilarious. Hahaha. You should send that to DJ.

Mark Ward said...

if he could only get his tiny penis

Well, my penis is small (only around 7 inches) so your statement is generally accurate.

As to the begging, not so much. I was simply disputing juris assertion that I was afraid to go back there.

You should send that to DJ.

In his case, I would also worry that he would get so upset that some sort of physical harm would come to him.

Haplo9 said...

>In his case, I would also worry that he would get so upset that some sort of physical harm would come to him.

I'm guessing here, but I'm pretty sure his main impression of you is of bemused sadness. Anyway, it is quite funny to see you trash talk TSM as if they all have a mental disabilities. The 3 years of incoherence you put into TSM should disabuse anyone of that notion should they wish to read it, and remember that list of your standard responses. That wasn't done to be mean or make fun of you - it's just you, over and over and over again. I long ago stopped mentioning them when you do them because it's obvious you don't see them as deficits of argument. (Besides, you found your own lists and started using them, apparently oblivious to the irony.)

juris imprudent said...

I admit to having some reticence at picking on people who have a disability.

Gosh, if I felt like that I could never comment here. In fact I take special pleasure in puncturing sanctimonious assholes' stupid assertions.

Eric said...

It's interesting to me how neither Juris Imprudent nor Haplo9 have commented on the candidate's insane stubborness here and the discussion is quickly turned on Mark. What do both of you think about this tack? Do you agree? Would either of you ever compromise with a liberal?

juris imprudent said...

Eric- M invited commentary on himself in this case. I really don't care about that candidate - he won't be a senator from my state, though gawd knows just about any dirtbag would be an improvement on Boxer/Feinstein. If the people of Indiana felt that Lugar wasn't doing the job - they are supposed to vote him out. And the opinions of members of the opposite party really don't amount to shit during a primary.

Haplo9 said...

This reminds me of a post where Mark likened conservatives to Nazis and then couldn't figure out why he got pushback that was personal. Surely, Eric, you can figure out the reason here?

As to the question:

1. I don't care. I doubt he's the first person from either party who has said that he won't compromise with those scumbags on the other side.
2. This is fake outrage. Was there great handwringing about compromise when Obamacare was passed almost entirely along partisan lines, without Republican input? Of course not. Both parties are happy to give the finger to the other if they have the votes to do so.

Sheik Yarbouti said...

Well, my penis is small (only around 7 inches) so your statement is generally accurate.

Dog inches?

Mark Ward said...

Mark likened conservatives to Nazis and then couldn't figure out why he got pushback that was personal.

Don't you think there are some striking similarities, though? The whole ideological purity thing...no compromise at all...strict adherence to rules and authority...

Larry said...

Do you really want to go there, Mark? You've never understood the whole "mote ... beam ... eye" thing, have you?

Mark Ward said...

Actually, Larry, I talked about this article recently...

http://markadelphia.blogspot.com/2012/04/health-care-fallout.html

So, I went there. Do you honestly believe that the whole ideological purity thing is comparable? I don't. It's just another false equivalency.

Larry said...

Yes, I do. You're consumed by that whole "my tribe is better than your tribe", and constantly ASS-U-ME that if someone isn't "for" your tribe, they must be "for" the other tribe. And, of course, you've repeatedly demonstrated a complete inability to distinguish between different groups that disagree with your tribe on differing sets of issue, and instead lump them all together into The Other Tribe That Opposes All That Is Right And Good And Sanctified.

Mark Ward said...

Actually, that's not true. I don't think that some of "my tribe" have a good handle on issues of national security. Many are very naive about the ways of the world. Like the right and their adherence to realism, the left's adherence to a liberal world view also completely failed to predict the end of the Soviet Union. They are also self-righteous to a fault and are, as the right points out quite accurately, far too sensitive about many issues (porn, race, cultural issues etc). They aren't realistic at all about energy issues (the bowel blowing about nuclear energy) and they are really fucked (just like the right) with the abortion issue.

So no, Larry, I'm not very tribal and can recognize the flaws with the people I support politically. Can you? If you choose to answer this question, please don't say offer criticisms of the right that essentially can be summarized as them being too liberal.

OtherWhiteMatt said...

Don't you think there are some striking similarities, though? The whole ideological purity thing...no compromise at all...strict adherence to rules and authority...

Not compared the similarities of the left's policies to the Nazis. Remember, Nazi is short for National SOCLIAST.

Mark Ward said...

Alright, Jonah Goldberg:)

Seriously, though, the purity tests by the right are pretty frightening when you consider them. That combined with the strict adherence to creed or be damned to eternal hell is similar the Nazis. Heck, the obsession with communism is pretty close as well!