Contributors

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

The Torch Is Finally Passed

In the film Bobby (2006, d: Emilio Estevez), a campaign worker, Dwayne, is having a conversation with one of the campaign leaders, Wade. It is June 4, 1968 and it is the day of the California Democratic primary. Robert F. Kennedy is just about win. Dwayne turns to Wade in a very poignant moment and says:

"Now that Dr. King is gone, no one left but Bobby - no one. "

Within hours, Bobby Kennedy would be shot. In the film, the last time we see Dwayne, he is walking out of the ballroom with his head in his hands, shaking his head and crying. The actor who plays Dwayne, Nick Cannon, perfectly conveys the total loss of all hope for the future that many, many people at the time felt.

I still feel it to this day.

Because the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and Robert F. Kennedy quite simply signified the triumph of evil over good. These three men represented a grave threat to a group of very powerful men in this country. If Jack, Martin or Bobby were ever allowed to live and have any real power (and Jack did for awhile), these dark hearted men would lose their wealth and influence. The policies of the Kennedys and King would've made things better for more people. Equality in all areas of our country would have been the order of the day. The accumulation of knowledge, not wealth, and of striving to be a better person would've been the goals. Imagine a country filled with intelligent, self-empowered people whose central goal was not greed. Imagine a population that was no longer living in fear. How would these evil men be able to manipulate us and prosper?

They would not be able to grind their boots into the faces of people like you and I. They would not be able to lord over us like medieval kings, demanding our servitude through the empty promise of money. They would not be able to use fear to ask us to sacrifice our lives, most likely for a lie that assists them in their selfish quest for the pretense of power.

On that day in June, almost 40 years ago, evil was victorious. The torch, that was shared and passed from Jack to Martin to Bobby, was extinguished by these horrible men. And they have been running our country ever since. We all know who they are. We see them on television everyday. They talk of "morality" and the "culture of life." What a joke. People like Jack, Martin, and Bobby....they represented the culture of life. The men that have been running our country for the last 40 years represent the culture of death. It's just that simple.

Since I was a child and my mother told me stories about the Kennedys and Dr. King, since I read about them in school and have devoted my life, in as many ways as I can, to spreading the word about their dream, I have held a small, silent hope that someone would come along and take up the torch. Not seeing anyone through the 70s, 80s, and 90s, I had all but given up.

On the evening of July 27th, 2004, I was revived from my negativity when the keynote address was given at the Democratic National Convention. The title of the speech was The Audacity of Hope. It was delivered by the junior senator from Illinois. His name was Barack Obama. As I watched him speak, my eyes began to water. His words....someone had picked up the torch. And I knew I had found the person that I wanted to lead this country.

Barack Obama, to put it simply, is America. You can see it in the story of his life, which can be read by clicking here or by buying his first book, Dreams of My Father, by clicking here. His second book, The Audacity of Hope (click here to buy), to put it simply, is what America should be. He is extremely intelligent, compassionate, and, what he lacks in experience, he makes up for in an abundance of intellectual curiosity.

His vision on the issues of the day, which can be read by clicking here, involve an interactive community of ideas which allow anyone to submit a writing, recording or video that would expand the field of solutions. Whether it's Iraq, health care, energy, or the environment, each issue section contains detailed information that drive hard for common sense solutions. I encourage all of you to click on each section on his issues page and read through his carefully researched ideas. All of them completely blow away anything anyone else has to offer while at the same time allow a blank tableau for new ideas from you and I. Simply amazing.

What does his central message to Americans really boil down to? His words....

"Get involved in an issue that you're passionate about. It almost doesn’t matter what it is--improving the school system, developing strategies to wean ourselves off foreign oil, expanding health care for kids. We give too much of our power away, to the professional politicians, to the lobbyists, to cynicism. And our democracy suffers as a result."

"When you focus on solving problems instead of scoring political points, and emphasize common sense over ideology, you'd be surprised what can be accomplished. It also helps if you're willing to give other people credit--something politicians have a hard time doing sometimes."

All of you can now see that it was Senator Obama who inspired me to write this entire series of presidential profiles. He re-affirmed my reasons for becoming a teacher. Barack Obama gets an A and is, hands down, the best candidate out of all of them. It was his words who encouraged me to look, with new eyes, at some of the people who, perhaps in the past, I would've ripped or even ignored and find common ground. And you know what? There is a lot more of it than one might think. That is what the torch truly is...it is the hope that we can all work together and be stronger as a team, learning from each other's differences. This is a very hard thing to do in this day and age when the people that are running our country....the people that stand to lose the most from an Obama presidency....continue to propagate the politics of divisiveness.

We have been divided and conquered. It is time to put someone in the White House who is going to truly unite us and make us stronger. We need a leader that is going to show us the power within ourselves and give us the freedom to explore our true potential. More importantly, we need to realize how sacred his message is and how vital it is that we protect it. There is no doubt in my mind that sometime between now and the election, an attempt is going to be made on Senator Obama's life. If he becomes too powerful, if he gets the nomination, if he wins the presidency, if he uses the power of the presidency for the common good of all of us, the men who stand to lose the most will attempt and possibly succeed in taking him out.

If it happens, people will say it is because he was black. A "crazed racist" will be blamed. That will be a lie. My hope is that all of you reading this will know the real reason why. It will be because he wanted, like Jack, Martin, and Bobby, to give more power to the comman man and make things equal....and better for more people. Now, we will all know who is responsible. We will all be watching.

Let's make sure it doesn't happen. Protect him by spreading the word about the power that each one of us has inside of ourselves. Let's remove the extra large bag of Cheetos from our laps, turn off the latest news on the celebrity du jour's reality show, and get out in our communities and do something that helps. If we all vote for Barack Obama, we give him the power that will, in turn, give us the power we need to vastly improve the quality of our lives. He will unleash the shackles with which those evil men have chained us. We will ignite the flame that will keep our children's future eternally bright. We will truly be free.

Barack Obama's central message speaks to the very nature of all of us, liberal or conservative. Because in the final analysis, the thing that is going to put American back on the right track is the individual effort of US citizens to improve our country's socio- and political systems. Senator Obama is saying look not at me but at yourself. Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country.

What are you prepared to do?

Wednesday: Video, Part 1 (of 2) of Senator Obama's Keynote Speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Bring your hankies....

21 comments:

Anonymous said...

Kum by ya my Lord, kum by ya. Oh, I’m sorry, I lost myself. I thought I was just hearing a poetry reading up in the San Francisco hills, circa 1969.

Anonymous said...

Truth be told, I love Obama too. He really inspires people to hope in a way that hasn't been done in a long time. He looks at the more positive side of everyone. I guess I should take back what I said earlier about you and why you were being so nice to conservatives. Oh well...

Anonymous said...

I was going to write up an amusing litany of criticisms against his positions, but alas, with a resume as skimpy as his, there's precious little to work with. Indeed, that may be his saving grace; not being caught up in voting questions because he’s not been around long enough. Then I thought perhaps I’d just mock some of his not-ready-for-prime-time speeches, but I’d hate to appear hypocritical seeing as GW has never been the most gifted orator. (I’m sure President Obama will get the same fairness from the media on his speaking gaffs as our current President.)

So, in the end, I can only pose the question: Isn't leader of the free world a position usually (and preferably) taken at the apex of one's career as opposed to the first promotion? In a country of 300 million, there’s nobody with a tad more meat on their resume? …With a bit more experience to lend to complex situations?

I'm in the process of reading that link on his positions and it truly is interesting. Interesting that people re-can the same message and sell it as revolutionary. I don't really have the time to address them all right now, so, I’ll just run through each one separately over time…

Improving Our Schools (this is one of my pet peeve areas, which is why I went there first):
I like how this starts. He admits that most politicians simply throw more money at problems or require tests. (Ok, he should have just stopped there...) Sounds good, right? And his solution? More money, of course. Did you actually read this? Even his first paragraph, he states the need for more “resources” (i.e. money) and then he outlines the programs which will need to be funded. Question: why is the left so afraid of accountability in the education system? We’ve got programs up the wahzoo. What’s wrong with proving that those programs are in fact working by testing students and teachers? Don't you want to know if it's working??? And here’s a novel idea; if we discover we need to change a program or bring in something new, why not replace the existing program so as to keep the budget balanced as opposed to just expanding the system with countless additional programs?

One of our education system's main problems, from Dave’s humble perspective, is that kids waste their days in class after class teaching them to put condoms on cucumbers, to be more confident and more tolerant and more this or that and little time on real education. I read a study listing the US as falling in rank among the most educated nations but at the same time that we’re always rated as the most confident. Hmmm…Arrogance and ignorance; not what I’m hoping for from our education system.

Complete tangent: I'm no authority on the Kennedy's, but I know a bit...from my chair, they've always appeared to be more Hillary types than Obama types. In as much as to how they used the FBI and other agencies to get the bad guys (which I had no problem with...for the most part I liked the Kennedy's...back then, anyway.). The ACLU would have a field day with those Kennedy brothers. I never knew that Robert Kennedy debated Ronald Reagan until today. I'm reading the transcript now and it's absolutely fascinating.

Side-side-question: I love the Kennedy quote you often reference, "ask not..."; so how come in today's politics nobody asks the American people to step up like that? Instead politicians (both sides) simply try to buy votes by offerring each group something. Is is political suicide to actually ask the populace to stand up and act like a man? (sorry for the sorta sexist connotation there...)

Mark Ward said...

Dave, you raise some great points. Working backwards, it's true. No one has asked us to step up. My grandma is always fond of telling me how she gave all of her underwear to the Army to be made into parachutes during WWII. Now that's sacrafice!! That's what a like about Obama. He says, in the end, that it's really up to us.

I've heard it said by many a conservative that if the Kennedys were around today, they might be Republicans. I think that from a social/morality issue, there is some truth to that. Foreign policy wise, they still would've been much different.

I disagree with you on the education system. I have been pretty entrenched in it for the last few years and working to get my masters with people that work all over Minnesota. The central problems boils down to these things.

1. Increase in cultural diversity. The only good thing about No Child is the aggregate data we have collected on how non white people learn. Our public education system needs to become more attuned to different learning styles amongst the wide variety of cultures we now have in our country.

2. Differentiation. Every student learns differently. Teachers need to pay attention to that. Grouping in small groups or in pairs really helps out when kids are at different levels.

3. Teachers are lazy. This is a fact, not an opinion.

4. Human capital. We need more people to hear the call of instruction. I disagree with Obama on the more money thing. Check this out..

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1215/p01s01-ussc.html

Of all the plans I have seen out there, this one seems to have the most merit. It is very radical and I think you will like it.

As far as the knock on Obama for his experience, how much experience did President Bush have when he entered office? Based on the outcome of his actions, he did not seem (nor does he still seem) to have any kind of grasp of foreign policy and international relations.

Obama has more experience than you might think. His life experiences in Africa alone are impressive enough not to mention his primary sponsoship, which President Bush signed into law late last year, of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Relief, Security, and Democracy Promotion Act. Since he took office, he also has been working closely with Richard Luger to track nuclear and biological weapons proliferation streaming out of Russia and possibly into the hands of terrorists. He and Luger went there last year on their summer recess to check up on the status of Lugar's program.

He has been to Iraq and Kuwait several times and has spent much time in Israel. On his last trip there, he told Palestinian students that the US will never agree to back a Palestinian government with Hamas involved. This was two weeks before the election that Hamas won.

So, he's not as green as you might think and he wants put in real effort at becoming smarter about the Middle East, which is a huge thing for me.

Anonymous said...

Mark, I think you need to write more columns like this...that emphasize the positive. You have something very extraordinary inside of you...a gift that allows you to express your passion and share it with the world. It is extremely attractive and you should continue to nuture it.

Anonymous said...

If Barack Obama is elected President, we might as well hand the keys of our country over to the terrorists.

Anonymous said...

Sarge, explain to all of us exactly what you mean by that. Every Democrat I know wants to stop the threat of terror, including myself, and I find your remarks offensive.

Anonymous said...

Liberals are always offended. Lighten up.

Anonymous said...

What I mean is that Dimocrats are basically a bunch of wimps when it comes to doing what needs to be done. It's either them or us. There's no talking with those people or reasoning. They want to kill all of us so we need to destroy them first. Dimocrats won't do that because they don't have the balls.

Anonymous said...

SW,

Yeah, liberals are always offended. Hello kettle, this is pot, you are completely and utterly fucking black!!!

Anonymous said...

So, sarge, am I to infer that you are advocating genocide?

Anonymous said...

Look trueblue I am going to make this real simple for you: either we kill them or they kill us. Which would you rather have?

Anonymous said...

Who are "they" exactly?

Anonymous said...

I think "they" would be the bad guys. Liberals just need a scorecard to help decipher the teams.

Anonymous said...

"They" would be Muslims. They want our culture destroyed and our people dead. Better them than us.

Anonymous said...

This has taken an interesting turn.

I hate to stereotype this to Muslims in general like some are trying to insinuate here because it's the Islamic fanatics, but...

WWII is everyone's favorite war analogy, so let’s apply it there.

The German people by and large were not fully on board with the National Socialist agenda, but as the National Socialists were in power, the people really didn't care too awfully much and one could legitimately argue they got something out of it all…and perhaps, just perhaps, enjoyed the status & power. Should the Allies have pussy-footed around them like they were innocent bystanders like we're doing with the general Muslim community in the War on Terror? Was the German populace that innocent? If you let that cesspool of hatred brew and rule you country and do nothing, are your hands clean? Too hard to get into the finer detail of the analogy, but I think you get the comparison. Nobody would use the word genocide, but is a clash of civilizations beyond the realm of discussion? If we can agree to call the Muslim world, its own civilization, look to what its leaders say. They “do” say that it is a clash of civilizations. And they say that they’re not looking for a handout or a concession from us; they’re looking to eliminate us. One of my favorite quotes (sorry, here it comes again) is from the holocaust survivor: “when someone says they want to kill you. Believe them.” Is it beyond comprehension to suggest that in many respects, it is very much us (Western civilization) against them (World-wide Sharia)?

Mark, you’re fond of saying knowledge is power. What if we have all the knowledge in the world concerning our “enemy”, but in the end, it doesn’t change the fact that they very well may want to kill you anyway. Knowledge does not benefit the man on the wrong end of a saber.

Anonymous said...

Pipe down torch, it'll be ok. You're so angry.

The reason you have to as who "they" are is the same reason you are a liberal.

So are you going to type up anything about politics on here or do you just dish out insults and call names?

Anonymous said...

I'm willing to bet that no one on here has ever travelled to the Middle East. Sarge? SW? Have you spent any length of time there as I have for my business?

To lump all Muslims into the category of "they" is ludicrous. Turn on the TV and you can see that there are a wide variety of factions just as there are within Christianity and the large majority are peaceful people. When I travel to the Middle East (4 times a year), people on the street ask me why America is so violent and hate them so much.
I tell them that not all Americans are violent, it's only a small percentage. They wonder if it is because we are Christians.

See the irony?

Mark Ward said...

Dave, I agree that this conversation has taken a turn and it is one that I really did not intend it to....since this was a more hopeful kum-by-ya post.

I think your WWII reference is not the same. Back then, we were dealing with a country that had a standing army. Now, we are dealing with several countries that sometimes seem to support Al Qaeda, sometimes not, or just hate them outright. They have no standing army. This is not a conventional battle. There is no doubt in my mind that some Islamic fanatics want Sharia law world wide but who are they? How many are there? Is it really all of them? I doubt.

Also, take a look at how Hitler consolidated power. (i.e. Reichstag Fire). Haunting similarities with 9-11. If anything, our country, not Al Qaeda, now is more like Germany at the time. But that's part of Life in the Bubble...something I am going to be talking about a lot in the next few weeks.

Anonymous said...

Ok, so it’s probably not the perfect analogy. But, I’m talking about the mindset of the general population as a comparison, not the collective army angle. I’m sure there were plenty of people in Dresden that were against the National Socialists, plenty that were content with them and plenty that didn’t care one way or another. The point I’m trying to make (apparently, badly) is that for the most part, the supposedly peace-loving Muslim community is mute. So, are they de facto participants due to their complacency? I’m not sure. But if a terrorist is going to hide behind your skirt and you just stand there willingly, should I be worried that I might hit you?

Btw…I don’t buy Torch’s moral equivalence to Christianity. If he travels there so much I’d think he’d be able to testify to the socialization of the Muslim culture.

The Reichstag fire? One could discuss the similarity in the solidarity that resulted, but the difference here is that the fire was deliberately set by the National Socialists to solidify said power. You’re not insinuating that 9/11 was perpetrated by President Bush for such a purpose are you? You’re smarter than that.

Mark Ward said...

Dave, totally with you on the muteness on the Muslim community. I don't think you made your point badly, I just didn't understand it on my end. It is extremley frustrating to not hear more from the Muslim community on what they are doing to stop the radical element in their culture.

Of course, the lamestream media is at least partly to blame for this. That's why I watch news from the Middle East all the time on my satellite. The more perspective the better I say...although the nightly Iranian newscast is not very eye opening and quite troubling.

I do not think that Preisdent Bush knew about 9-11 ahead of time. Nor do I think that he plotted to make it happen. Here is what I do think

http://markadelphia.blogspot.com/2006/10/roof-is-on-fire.html

and

http://markadelphia.blogspot.com/2006/09/conspiracies-go-go.html

A lot of what is going on now can be traced back to the Project for the New American Century report on rebuilding America's defenses Here is a link for it..

http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

It contains the line

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event —like a new Pearl Harbor."

So, do I think these guys sat around and planned 9-11? No. Do I think they knew something was coming and if it happened it would work to their advantage?

Yes.